Preparing to Teach Mathematics with Technology

Preparing to Teach Mathematics with Technology

  • PTMT Home
  • About Us
  • Materials
    • Examining Students’ Practices in Algebra and Function
    • Teaching Algebra
    • Teaching Geometry
    • Teaching Statistics Investigations
    • Teaching Data Analysis and Probability
    • Voices from the Field
  • Impact
    • Publications
    • Presentations
    • Webinars & Conferences
    • Dissertations & Theses

Leading Productive Discussions with Web-Based Dynamic Geometry Tools (LEAD DG) > Module 1

PTMT LEAD DG Icon showing a sphere, cube, pyramid, and compass

LEAD DG Module 1 – Introduction to DGEs & Tools

In this module, teachers explore the perpendicular bisector using physical tools, Desmos, GeoGebra, and Web Sketchpad to examine how different tools shape mathematical exploration and reasoning. Through these experiences, teachers consider how technology can support geometric understanding and learn to align learning goals, tasks, and tools to support meaningful mathematical learning.

Module Elements

1.1 Physical Tools: Construction & Goals

Teachers explore the perpendicular bisector using paper folding, a compass and straightedge, and a mira to investigate its role as a construction, a locus of points, and a line of symmetry. This section highlights how physical tools support different kinds of geometric reasoning and introduces the relationship between tool choice and instructional goals.

Class Slides
Google
PowerPoint


Student Handout
Google
Word
1.2 Desmos: Testing & Constructing

Teachers use Desmos Geometry to construct perpendicular bisectors and investigate the idea of equidistance through dynamic exploration. The focus is on using technology to make conjectures, test ideas, and reason about geometric relationships.

Class Slides
Google
PowerPoint


Student Handout
Google
Word
1.3 GeoGebra: Construction, Invariance, & Why it Holds

Teachers investigate multiple ways to construct a perpendicular bisector in GeoGebra while examining how different construction methods emphasize different mathematical ideas. This section focuses on invariance under dragging and selecting construction approaches that best align with the intended learning goal.

Class Slides
Google
PowerPoint


Student Handout
Google
Word
1.4 Web Sketchpad: Constraint as a Pedagogical Decision

Teachers use Web Sketchpad to compare constructions completed with different sets of available tools and experience how restricting tool access can shape mathematical thinking. This section explores how author-controlled tool libraries can be used as intentional pedagogical decisions to support specific learning goals.

Class Slides
Google
PowerPoint


Student Handout
Google
Word
1.5 Evaluating Alignment: Does this task, with this tool, serve the goal?

Teachers analyze how learning goals, task design, and dynamic geometry environments work together to influence students’ mathematical thinking. This section introduces a process for evaluating whether a technology tool is being used with pedagogical, mathematical, and cognitive fidelity to support the intended learning goal.

Class Slides
Google
PowerPoint


Student Handout
Google
Word

PTMT is supported by the National Science Foundation under grants DUE 0442319, 0817253, 1123001 1625713, 1820976, and 2235338 awarded to NC State University, grant DUE 1820998 awarded to Middle Tennessee State University, grant DUE 1821054 awarded to University of North Carolina at Charlotte, and grants DUE 1820967 and 2235393 awarded to East Carolina University. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed herein are those of the principal investigators and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.